<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
This mixed-methods study delves into the perceptions of Turkish EFL Pre-service Teachers regarding native English-speaking teachers (NESTs) and non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs) and explores the potential impact of being an NNEST on their future teaching practices. In order to identify their perceptions, a questionnaire was conducted with 41 participants and the data were analyzed via descriptive statistics. In the qualitative part, open-ended questions were directed to the participants to elucidate how they think being NNEST might impact their future teaching practices. Responses were scrutinized using thematic analysis. The overall results indicated that Turkish EFL pre-service teachers recognized English can be taught effectively by both NESTs and NNESTs. They perceived having empathy in understanding students’ needs and difficulties as the main advantage of being NNEST while expressing concerns about potential disadvantages fortheir future practices such as nonnative pronunciation and language proficiency. On the other hand, being more self-confident and competent in using the English Language as well as teaching vocabulary, listening skills, and fluency better were the perceived main advantages of NESTs. Having a shared mother tongue with the students was considered both an advantage and a disadvantage.
Native English-Speaking Teachers(Nests);Non-Native English-Speaking Teachers(Nnests);Pre-Service Teachers;English LanguageTeaching;Teacher Perceptions, Language Studies (Other), Dil Çalışmaları (Diğer)
Native English-Speaking Teachers(Nests);Non-Native English-Speaking Teachers(Nnests);Pre-Service Teachers;English LanguageTeaching;Teacher Perceptions, Language Studies (Other), Dil Çalışmaları (Diğer)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |