
Scheduled public transport data has been used extensively for estimating travel times in measuring accessibility to a wide range of services by alternative modes of transport. However, fewer studies to date have investigated the implications of using real-time travel data versus transit schedule data to investigate spatial patterns of accessibility. The overall aims of this study are to display the potential uses of live transit data that can be used to examine the accessibility differences introduced by using open data sources of real-time traffic data. Drawing on case studies for Cardiff and Swansea, the aim is to explore the implications of differences between scheduled and actual bus provision for accessibility to POIs in the respective cities. We conclude by suggesting that such impacts are often overlooked when using scheduled timetable data in accessibility analysis.
Open-Source; Predictive Analysis; Real-time versus scheduled data; Accessibility Implications; Isochrones, SIRI-VM.
Open-Source; Predictive Analysis; Real-time versus scheduled data; Accessibility Implications; Isochrones, SIRI-VM.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
