
The linguistic characteristics of symbols in the English and Uzbek languages are examined in this article, along with how symbols work in each language system. We examine the linguistic encoding of culturally significant symbols through a comparative approach, concentrating on both the socio-pragmatic elements and lexicographical representation. The results demonstrate that although symbols are used in both languages to express cultural values and meanings, there are notable differences in how these symbols are created and understood depending on historical, cultural, and sociolinguistic aspects.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
