
The definition of racism is critical for combating it and advancing the scientific understanding of race-related issues. However, the prevailing Western definition—belief in racial differences and hierarchy—is scientifically inaccurate and morally deficient. A new definition, grounded in insights into human genetic diversity and morality, is urgently needed. By comparing Western and Eastern core values—freedom versus moral integrity—it becomes clear that omitting morality from the definition of racism is itself immoral. We propose that racism is better defined as acting immorally toward other races, encompassing evils like colonialism and enslavement.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
