
This report, the first in a two-part study of the Responsible AI landscape by the UKRI’s BRAID programme, provides a chronological and conceptual map of the Responsible AI (R-AI) ecosystem. We chart the role of various actors and communities in this ecosystem’s emergence, especially the vital contributions from the arts and humanities, and the historical development and contestation of different meanings of ‘responsibility’ in the context of AI. In the Preface, we outline the motivation and aims of the study. In Section One, we outline the different meanings and conceptions of ‘Responsible AI’ commonly deployed by different stakeholders. We follow in Section Two with a chronological account of how ‘responsibility’ for the impact of new technologies in computing came to be articulated, culminating in what today we call the Responsible AI ecosystem. We trace this history from the 1950s to the present, concluding in Section Three with a review of seven lessons learned from these ‘first waves’ of Responsible AI research, practice, and advocacy; lessons that can be carried forward in our collective efforts to enable and sustain responsible AI innovation, now and for the future.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
