Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Clitics in the Old Russian space. Following Andrej A. Zaliznjak's book "Old Russian Enclitics" (2008)

Authors: Zimmerling, Anton;

Clitics in the Old Russian space. Following Andrej A. Zaliznjak's book "Old Russian Enclitics" (2008)

Abstract

A review article with a discussion of Andrej A. Zaliznjak's book 'Old Russian Enclitics' (Moscow: LRC, 2008). Comments. The reviewed book of the great Russian linguist Andrej A. Zaliznjak (1935 - 2017) is his last contribution to the syntax of Old Russian clitics. It develops the findings outlined in his seminal work Zaliznjak 1993, where Zaliznjak proved that vernacular Old Russian had Wackernagel's law in its most consistent form and proposed an account of rhythmical-syntactic barriers, i. e. context-bound factors changing the surface positions of Wackernagel's clitics. On unclear reasons, Zaliznjak's 1993 discovery of Wackernagel's law in Russian attracted less attention from syntacticians than his 2008 book, where he compares the vernacular Old Russian clitic system with the clitic syntax in the Bookish Old Russian texts and argues that the bookish Old Russian system could be derived from the vernacular system but not vice versa. Zaliznjak's description is in some aspects close to the so-called prosodic approach advocated by Halpern 1996 and other scholars. He also argued for multidimensional classifications of clitics. As an experienced accentologist, Zaliznjak knew that the class of clitics can be modeled differently if one sticks to phonetic (prosodic) vs syntactic criteria. Some other scholars, incl. Klavans (1985), Sadock (1989), Aikhenvald (2002), and the reviewer (2002) developed similar intuitions. However, Zaliznjak's own treatment of his innovative research tool, the barrier theory, is somewhat limited since he tries to explain late clitic placement (CL > 2 orders) solely by (sentence) prosody and does not take into account syntactic factors. In this review, I cite the first publication of Zaliznjak's book 'Slovo o Polku Igoreve. Vzgljad lingvista' (2004). Those who are accustomed to later revised editons (2007, 2008) should not think it is a typo or mistake. The research context of this book and this review is commented upon here: https://zenodo.org/records/15116136

Related Organizations
Keywords

particles, clitic templates, pronouns, linguistic typology, clitic clusters, auxiliaries, clitics, Languages and linguistics, word order

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average