
CONTEXT: Agriculture in India is increasingly adopting Integrated Farming Systems (IFS), which combine various agricultural and non-agricultural activities to optimize resource use and improve farmers' incomes. This study focuses on the economic impacts of IFS in Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh, two states with distinct agro-climatic conditions, to better understand how IFS can enhance farm sustainability and economic stability. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to compare the economic outcomes of IFS in Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh, specifically evaluating income generation from various IFS components and models. The study seeks to identify the most effective IFS models in improving farmers' livelihoods in these regions. METHODOLOGY: A comparative descriptive design was used, with data collected from 320 respondents across 32 villages in both states. A multistage random sampling approach was applied, and a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was employed, including surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions. Statistical tools, such as a Z-test, were used to analyse income differences between the two states. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study found that IFS models in both states generated similar average annual incomes (₹1.73 lakh in Chhattisgarh and ₹1.69 lakh in Madhya Pradesh). Crop production was the largest income source, but livestock and vegetable farming performed better in Madhya Pradesh, while Chhattisgarh excelled in fishery. Diversified models, such as those integrating fishery, proved to be more lucrative. SIGNIFICANCE: This research highlights the potential of IFS to increase farmer incomes and resilience, offering policy insights to optimize specific components and guide future farming strategies in both states.
Integrated Farming System, Income, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh
Integrated Farming System, Income, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
