
Table 1. Characteristics of the females of Krantzolaspina angustatus comb. nov., and some ambiguous or unknown data of K. rebatii and K. solimani comb. nov. ? indicates unknown or uncertain/unclear data. 1 All setae are smooth and moderately long, except when mentioned otherwise. * holotype not found, presumed lost; characters presented are based on the original description.CharactersK. angustatus (Ishikawa, 1987) comb. nov.* K. rebatii Datta & Bhattacharjee, 1989* K. solimani (Metwali, 1983) comb. nov.Dorsal shield ornamentationmostly reticulate (smooth on the dorso-central region around bases of z1 and J2)completely smooth?with tetra- and pentagonal reticulation (except on dorsocentral region of setae j-J, faintly ornamented)Sternometasternal / ventrianal shield ornamentationcompletely reticulate and with the lateral margins covered by some semi-rounded cellsmostly smooth but with lateral margins pointed?/ anterior margin pointed, elsewhere smooth?mostly with tetra and pentagonal reticulationParapodal-peritremal shield ornamentationslightly reticulate + semi-rounded cells posterior to the coxa IVcompletely smooth?completely smooth?1 Setae of opisthogastric cuticle (JV - ZV)Seven pairs (JV3 -5, ZV2 - 5); JV4 - 5 and ZV4 - 5 piloseSix pairs (JV4 - 5, ZV2 - 5)?Six pairs (JV4 -5, ZV2 - 5)Deutosternum: no. rowsNinethree??Leg chetotaxy?(Coxa - Tibia)I2, 6, 13, 12, 12, not counted?,?, 10, 11, 11,?II2, 5, 11, 10, 10, 18?, 4, 10, 9,?,?III2, 5, 6, 8, 8, 18?, 3, 5, 8, 7,?IV1, 5, 6, 8, 8, 18?,?, 4, 6, 7,?
Published as part of Quintero-Gutierrez, Edwin Javier, Sandmann, Dorothee, Combita-Heredia, Orlando, Klarner, Bernhard, Widyastuti, Rahayu & Scheu, Stefan, 2020, Review of the mite genus Krantzolaspina Datta & Bhattacharjee (Mesostigmata, Parholaspididae) with re-description of K. angustatus comb. nov. (Ishikawa) from Indonesia, pp. 47 in ZooKeys 997 on page 47, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.997.54262
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
