
This repository contains the data and source code used to produce the results presented in: Souza‐Junior, G. F., Uieda, L., Trindade, R. I. F., Fu, R. R., Bellon, U. D., & Castro, Y. M. (2026). Robust Directional Analysis of Magnetic Microscopy Images Using Non‐Linear Inversion and Iterative Euler Deconvolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 131(4). doi:10.1029/2025jb031725. Abstract Scientists often study entire samples to understand their overall properties, but this approach can miss important details. To get a clearer picture, researchers are improving methods that focus on smaller regions of a sample. In paleomagnetism, a field that studies the Earth's ancient magnetic field, magnetic microscopy allows scientists to examine tiny areas with high precision. In this study, we use magnetic microscopy data to determine the direction of magnetization in samples. To do this, we apply a mathematical method called Euler deconvolution, which helps solve complex calculations and reduce uncertainty. We also refine our results with an additional step that improves accuracy and removes unwanted signals. We tested this approach on both simulated and real data. Our results show that this new method can detect weaker magnetic sources and accurately determine the direction of magnetization. When applied to real samples, it successfully identified their original magnetic direction. This represents an important step in using magnetic microscopy for paleomagnetic research. License All Python source code (including .py and .ipynb files) is made available under the MIT license. You can freely use and modify the code, without warranty, so long as you provide attribution to the authors. See LICENSE-MIT.txt for the full license text. The manuscript text (including all LaTeX files), figures, and data/models produced as part of this research are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC-BY). See LICENSE-CC-BY.txt for the full license text.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
