
Scientific publications are the cornerstone of academic validation, career advancement, and the shaping of research discourse. However, the conventional publishing process has often overlooked the importance of gender sensitivity. Embedding gender analysis into every stage of research and publication not only helps mitigate biases and discrimination but also enriches scientific inquiry by incorporating diverse perspectives. This brief presents a set of guidelines from MINDtheGEPs that have been developed to transform the approach to gender in academic publishing, ensuring that every stage of the research process is both inclusive and equitable. By prioritizing gender-sensitive research design, inclusive language, and diverse evaluative practices, academic institutions and publishers can drive systemic change thatleads to more robust, equitable, and innovative scientific outcomes. These guidelines aim to help reframe the way gender is considered in academic publishing, moving beyond token acknowledgement toward a systematic approach that integrates gender considerations into research questions, methodologies, and the communication of findings.
Gender equality, academic publishing, scientific publication
Gender equality, academic publishing, scientific publication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
