
Abstract Education is a fundamental right, yet crises such as natural disasters, armed conflicts, and global pandemics disrupt learning worldwide, affecting students' academic progress and well-being. Ensuring educational continuity in times of crisis requires proactive planning, adaptive instructional strategies, and innovative technological integration. This paper explores crisis-sensitive educational planning, emphasizing the importance of risk assessments, preparedness measures, and data-driven decision-making to mitigate disruptions. Additionally, it examines resilient instructional strategies, particularly trauma-informed pedagogy, which supports students' psychological well-being and fosters engagement during emergencies. The role of technology is also analyzed, highlighting digital learning platforms, AI-driven educational tools, and remote learning initiatives that enable continued access to education despite physical school closures. By synthesizing case studies and existing literature, this study identifies best practices and challenges in sustaining education during crises. While technology and policy interventions offer promising solutions, disparities in digital access, teacher training, and funding remain significant barriers. The findings underscore the necessity of multi-stakeholder collaboration, including governments, educators, NGOs, and private-sector partners, to build more resilient and inclusive education systems. Strengthening crisis-responsive education policies and expanding access to digital learning resources can help ensure that no student is left behind during times of disruption. Keywords: disaster-proof learning, crisis-sensitive educational planning, resilient instruction, technology in education, education in emergencies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
