Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Flowchart for self-assessing ethical and equitable engagement for energy data

Authors: Raymond, Vanessa; Dobbins, Elizabeth; Fisher, William;

Flowchart for self-assessing ethical and equitable engagement for energy data

Abstract

The data and cyberinfrastructure teams at Alaska Center for Energy and Power (ACEP) share how we assess our own handling of energy data from the framework of ethical, equitable engagement, and community-led energy transitions. Our assessment particularly focuses on how we can center community-level decision-making and Indigenous leadership in the process of working with community energy data. We created this assessment tool to ensure we are sufficiently prioritizing relationship-building, societal benefits, and long-term collaboration with and for the benefit of Indigenous communities that partner with ACEP on energy research. ACEP’s data and cyberinfrastructure self-assessment is part of a large emphasis andresearch inquiry into how socio-technical data systems can be designed to align with both community and researcher objectives. In the future we hope to apply this tool in team “retrospectives” to continuously improve our internal processes, as well as analyze case studies from ACEP’s research where communities are leading energy transitions, demonstrating how community ownership of energy data and projects ensures equity and long-term success. In the process, research team also reflected on how the assessment incorporates Kawerak-Region Tribal Research Protocols, Guidelines, Expectations, and Best Practices (Kawerak, 2024), the Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Ethical and Equitable Engagement (ICC, 2021), the SAON ROADS process (Starkweather et al, 2021), and the CARE principles (GIDA, 2020) - seminal works that play a role in helping ACEP to effectively support Indigenous data sovereignty and fostering trust in energy data research.

CRediTElizabeth Dobbins - investigation, project administration, conceptualizationWilliam Fisher - investigation, project administration, conceptualizationDominique Pride - validationVanessa Raymond - Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, projectadministration, supervision, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - reviewing & editing

A version 1.0 flowchart to show the decisions and decisionmaking process to go from research question to data collection in a community-engaged research practice. This flowchart reflects and documents the data culture and practices of the data science and cyberinfrastructure and research teams at Alaska Center for Energy and Power at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Symbology for flowchart shapes diamonds questions or decision points parallelograms data inputs or outputs rectangles processes ovals start or end arrows connector, shows relationships

Related Organizations
Keywords

data ethics, energy data, flow diagram

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities