Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evidencing the Impact of Research Software Engineers: survey database

Authors: Beavan, David; Piza, Andre; Seip, Oscar; Hearn, Rob; Francois, Pieter; Fagan, Stephanie;

Evidencing the Impact of Research Software Engineers: survey database

Abstract

Evidencing the Impact of Research Software Engineers: survey database This is the evidence base gathered in support of Evidencing the Impact of Research Software Engineers on Arts & Humanities Scholarship Authors David Beavan, The Alan Turing Institute André Piza, The Alan Turing Institute Oscar Seip, University of Manchester Rob Hearn Pieter Francois, The Alan Turing Institute/University of Oxford Stephanie Fagan, The Alan Turing Institute Authors of this work retain copyright and release the work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who have contributed, under anonymity, to the evidence base. Without these rich responses we could not have created such a community inspired document. The credit framework we use is the Contributor Roles Taxonomy CRediT – a high-level taxonomy comprising 14 roles that can be used to describe contributions to a research output. While the contributor roles definition can be open to interpretation, we consider that they fit well the types of contributions we have attributed to the authors. Conceptualisation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration: David Beavan, André Piza Conceptualisation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation: Rob Hearn Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision: Pieter Francois Writing – review & editing: David Beavan, Rob Hearn Data curation, Supervision: David Beavan Conceptualisation, Project administration: Stephanie Fagan Investigation: Oscar Seip This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council [grant number AH/Y00745X/1].

Related Organizations
Keywords

Digital Research Infrastructure, Research Software Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities