Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge 2025

Authors: Ammeling, Jonas; Aubreville, Marc; Banerjee, Sweta; Bertram, Christof A.; Breininger, Katharina; Hirling, Dominik; Horvath, Peter; +2 Authors

Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge 2025

Abstract

Generalization to previously unseen real-world data is the most important property of any machine learning algorithms. Yet, it is also one of the most challenging ones, as the data distribution used during training of, especially, deep learning algorithms, is commonly not representative of the real world use case. Domain generalization approaches try to mitigate this by applying tailored augmentation, sampling, or regularization techniques that encourage the model to learn more robust and transferable features. One area, where domain generalization is a particular issue, is the field of digital pathology, where the digital image is influenced by a significant number of parameters influencing the tissue preprocessing, staining procedure, and digitization. Moreover, the biological variability in tissue is considerable, leading to strong data variance depending on the tissue or tumor type, but also on the question which part of tissue is actually annotated and presented to the algorithms. The MIDOG 2025 challenge is providing yet another step towards the assessment of generalization for one of the most commonly tackled tasks in tumor pathology: Mitosis identification. The process of cell division (mitosis) is indicative of tumor growth and proliferation, and as such is part of the manual assessment of tumor alignancyby experts for many tumor types. Following up on the successful MIDOG 2021 and 2022 MICCAI challenges, we propose a third iteration of our challenge, focusing even more strongly on data variation that algorithms working in clinical environments must cope with. Previous challenges were limited towards pre-selected hot-spot regions, leaving the question of generalization to whole slide images open. This year, aiming to generalize to whole slide image applicability, the algorithms have to additionally show their robustness on a wider range of tissues, including non-hotspot regions or even non-tumor areas as well as inflammatory or necrotic areas, which occur in tumor samples regularly. Besides the main task of mitosis detection, another task of high scientific interest is covered in the challenge: mitotic figures with atypical morphologies have been shown to be an independent prognosticator of tumor malignancy. We therefore include the classification of normal vs. atypical mitotic figures as a second challenge track in the MIDOG 2025 challenge.

Keywords

atypical mitosis, MICCAI 2025 challenge, mitosis detection, domain generalization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average