
This document presents the CESSDA recommendations for data citations, outlining core components of a data citation. It provides specific and practical recommendations tailored to various stakeholders: Data repositories Authors (i.e., researchers, students, journalists, etc.) Academic journals and publishers Research performing organisations (RPOs) High-level research policy and strategy development entities Ethics committees Developed by the CESSDA Data Citation Working Group, this document represents a collaborative effort to promote best practices in data citation, ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and credit for data authors.
Ethics Committees, Research performing organisations (RPOs), Data repositories, Data citation, High-Level Research Policy and Strategy Development Entities, CESSDA, Data authors, Why Cite Data, Academic journals, Academic publishers, Anatomy of a Data Citation
Ethics Committees, Research performing organisations (RPOs), Data repositories, Data citation, High-Level Research Policy and Strategy Development Entities, CESSDA, Data authors, Why Cite Data, Academic journals, Academic publishers, Anatomy of a Data Citation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
