Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15023
Vocabularies typically reflect a consensus among experts in a certain application domain. They are thus implemented in collaboration of domain experts and knowledge engineers. Particularly the presence of domain experts with little technical background requires a low-threshold vocabulary engineering methodology. This methodology should be im- plementable without dependencies on complex software components, it should provide collaborators with comprehensible feedback on syntax and semantics errors in a tight loop, and it should give access to a human- readable presentation of the vocabulary. Inspired by agile software and content development methodologies, we define the VoCol methodology to address these requirements. We implemented a prototype based on a loose coupling of validation and documentation generation components on top of a standard Git repository. All of these components, even the repository engine, can be exchanged with little effort. By evaluating the usefulness of error feedback of different tools in the realistic setting of an emerging mobility vocabulary we prove, however, that our choice of the crucial validation component is workable.
collaborative vocabulary development
collaborative vocabulary development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 23 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts