Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Django vs ASP.Net Core: сравнительный анализ архитектурных паттернов для масштабируемых enterprise-решений

Django vs ASP.Net Core: comparative analysis of architectural patterns for scalable enterprise solutions

Django vs ASP.Net Core: сравнительный анализ архитектурных паттернов для масштабируемых enterprise-решений

Abstract

В данной статье рассматриваются архитектурные подходы к разработке масштабируемых enterprise-решений с использованием двух популярных веб-фреймворков: Django (Python) и ASP.NET Core (C#). Анализируются ключевые аспекты архитектуры, такие как использование паттернов проектирования, обработка запросов, управление базами данных, масштабируемость и отказоустойчивость. Особое внимание уделено различиям между архитектурными стилями MVC (Model-View-Controller) в Django и ASP.NET Core, возможностям интеграции с микросервисами, а также преимуществам и недостаткам каждого подхода в контексте корпоративной разработки. В статье представлено сравнительное исследование, включая анализ производительности, удобства сопровождения и гибкости масштабирования, а также рекомендации по выбору технологии в зависимости от специфики проекта

This article explores architectural approaches to developing scalable enterprise solutions using two popular web frameworks: Django (Python) and ASP.NET Core (C#). Key aspects of architecture are analyzed, including the use of design patterns, request processing, database management, scalability, and fault tolerance. Particular attention is paid to differences between the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural styles in Django and ASP.NET Core, integration capabilities with microservices, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach in corporate development. The article presents a comparative study, including performance analysis, maintainability, and scalability flexibility, along with recommendations for choosing a technology depending on project specifics

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green