Meta-AI Analysis – Cross-Validation of AI Models to Gain Objective Insights into Big Pharma and Google's Influence on Health Information
Meta-AI Analysis – Cross-Validation of AI Models to Gain Objective Insights into Big Pharma and Google's Influence on Health Information
The Meta-AI Analysis cross-validates six AI models (ChatGPT, Grok 3, Gemini, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Copilot) to investigate Big Pharma’s profit motives and Google’s YMYL guidelines in health information control. Triggered by Gemini’s statements (January 31 and March 5, 2025), it reveals: Big Pharma prioritizes profit over cures, Google suppresses alternative healing methods as a gatekeeper, and AI biases amplify this system. OpenAI’s censorship of critical sections – e.g., ‘manipulation’ and ‘2–4 million preventable deaths’ – highlights pervasive control. Original conversations are linked as primary evidence, with video backups on Odysee (https://odysee.com/The-Meta-AI-Analysis:4) and Brighteon (https://www.brighteon.com/51417fb7-6a99-42ce-ac4d-8de8f2c22c72). This method offers unfiltered insights into these power structures, demanding transparency in AI and health policy.
Big Pharma, Health Information Exchange, Algorithmic Bias, Health Policy, Google YMYL, Health Information Systems, Health Information Management, Alternative Healing, Meta-AI Analysis, Cross-Validation, Health Policy/economics, Health Information, AI Censorship, Health Policy/trends, Ethics in AI
Big Pharma, Health Information Exchange, Algorithmic Bias, Health Policy, Google YMYL, Health Information Systems, Health Information Management, Alternative Healing, Meta-AI Analysis, Cross-Validation, Health Policy/economics, Health Information, AI Censorship, Health Policy/trends, Ethics in AI
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!