Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Research on (re)search: FLOSS as an open knowledge infrastructure

Authors: Ridgway, Renée;

Research on (re)search: FLOSS as an open knowledge infrastructure

Abstract

This talk delves into the values and ethics of Free Software, traversing its negotiations of knowledge and power by Silicon Valley behemoths that are all built on foundations of Linux servers and open source software. It follows the evolving nomenclature of F(L)OSS to open source, which has been offered as a business model for (corporate) infrastructure; simultaneously it recounts how software developers worldwide built new infrastructures and technical solutions based on shared resources and open code. Yet was Free Software a dispositif (Foucault), an ideology (Stallman), a strategy, as with open source (Raymond), or an “open knowledge infrastructure” that is not understood enough? To grasp this interplay between these technical infrastructures as artefacts and human organisation, as well as the ethics and politics implicit within their design, speaking directly with those immanent is essential. Semi-structured interviews with developers, academics, geeks and awardees from NGI (Next Generation Internet) Search projects, which have to be made open source upon completion, put forth the value openness in relation to other core ethics: useability, modifiability and maintenance. A critical discourse analysis interweaves excerpts from the interviews structured by Star and Ruhleder’s dimensions (1996), or Star’s properties (1999), of an emerging infrastructure. The Free Software movement of past decades resurfaces through the makers/practitioners of today, who, as a recursive public (Kelty 2008), elucidate the techno-infrastructural through the medium itself (code). These interventions go beyond the critique of open source as a solution to proprietary software and copyleft ideology to show how they differ more on an ethical, than a technical, level. Drawing on a chapter for the forthcoming book Politics of Open Infrastructures, this presentation demonstrates how F(L)OSS can be deemed an open (knowledge) infrastructure through its reorientation of knowledge and power, whilst revealing some of the values and ethical considerations embedded within developing open source (search) projects.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!