Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

De novo genome assembly of Gentiana triflora and Gentiana scabra

Authors: Abe, Akira; Nishihara, Masahiro;

De novo genome assembly of Gentiana triflora and Gentiana scabra

Abstract

We conducted de novo genome assembly of Gentiana triflora and Gentiana scabra using Nanopore long reads. These species are typically heterozygous; however, haploid individuals were generated for both species following the method described by Doi et al. (2013). The haploid genomes were sequenced using a Nanopore sequencer for de novo assembly. The raw sequencing data in FAST5 format were base-called using Guppy v4.2.2 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Genome assembly was performed with Flye v2.8.1 (Kolmogorov et al., 2019), followed by two rounds of error correction with Racon v1.4.13 (Vaser et al., 2017). Misassemblies were corrected using Medaka v1.2.1 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka). Further consensus correction was conducted using short reads obtained from the DNBSEQ platform with minimap2 v2.17 (Li 2018) and HyPo v1.0.3 (Kundu et al., 2019). Finally, artificial contigs were removed using Purge Haplotigs v1.0.4 (Roach et al., 2018). Table. Genome assembly statistics of G.triflora and G. scabra Genome assembly statistic Gentiana_triflora_draft_v1.0.fasta Gentiana_scabra_draft_v1.0.fasta Total length (bp) 3,657,985,820 3,786,908,358 Number of contigs 4,374 9,719 Length of the largest contig (bp) 13,845,662 6,219,710 Average length of contigs (bp) 836,302 389,640 N50 length (bp) 2,702,773 946,422 GC content 37.69% 37.42% Percentage of complete genes idetified using BUSCO v4.1.4 with embryophyta_odb10 95.4% 94.8%

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average