Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Simulated data from the article "MntJULiP and Jutils: Differential splicing analysis of RNA-seq data with covariates"

Authors: Lui, Wui Wang; Florea, Liliana;

Simulated data from the article "MntJULiP and Jutils: Differential splicing analysis of RNA-seq data with covariates"

Abstract

The repository includes alignments of simulated RNA-seq data for evaluating differential splicing detection with covariates. Starting from an empirical transcript expression matrix trained on an RNA-seq data set from lung fibroblasts (GenBank A# SRR493366) and using GENCODE v.41 as reference, 11.5 million 100 bp long paired-end reads were generated per sample, from 2,000 genes with two or more expressed isoforms. RNA-seq data was simulated for one ‘condition’, with values ‘control’, ‘disease’ and ‘stage2’, with one covariate, ‘biological sex’, with values ‘M’ and ‘F’. 10 samples each were simulated for each (condition x sex) category. Changes were simulated in the expression (DE) and/or the splicing ratio (DS) of genes as follows. Changes in expression (DE) were simulated by either halving or doubling the expression level of the gene. Changes in splicing ratios (DS) were simulated by swapping the expression levels of the gene’s top two transcript isoforms. All RNA-seq data was mapped to the hg38 genome with the spliced alignment tool STAR v2.7.10a. Pairwise comparison alignment set: Differences due to ‘condition’ between two states, ‘control’ and ‘disease’, were simulated at 600 genes, including 200 DE, 200 DS and 200 DE+DS genes. Differences in ‘biological sex’ (covariate) were represented as changes in 300 genes, with 100 genes from each of the DS, DE and DE+DS categories. Hence, the target gene set for differential splicing ratio (DSR) pairwise comparisons consists of the pooled 200 DS and 200 DS+DE genes differentially spliced between the ‘control’ and ‘disease’ states, while for differential splicing abundance (DSA) pairwise comparisons the target gene set is the set of 600 modified genes, 200 in each of the DS, DE and DS+DE categories. Multiway (3-way) comparison alignment set: To create the 'stage2' data, changes in expression and splicing levels were maintained for 3 x 100 of the 'disease' genes (100 in each category). Further, 'stage2'-specific changes were made to a set of 200 additional genes not encountered previously, for each of the categories DE, DS and DE+DS. Therefore, for DSR three-way comparisons, the target gene set represents the 800 genes simulated as being DS or DE+DS between any of the ‘control’, ‘disease’ and ’stage2’ categories, while for the multi-way DSA comparisons the target is the full set of 1,200 genes (400 DE, 400 DS and 400 DE+DS) simulated to have changed between any of the 'control', 'disease’ and ‘stage2’ states. Further details: See the ‘key’ package for the gene lists and sample metadata.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Alternative Splicing, differential splicing, RNA-Seq, covariates, Transcriptome

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average