Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Bothynus gisae Duarte, Dupuis and Grossi 2025, sp. n.

Authors: Duarte, Paulo R. M.; Dupuis, Fabien; Grossi, Paschoal C.;

Bothynus gisae Duarte, Dupuis and Grossi 2025, sp. n.

Abstract

Bothynus gisae Duarte, Dupuis and Grossi sp. n. (Figures 3 (g), 11(g), 13(g), 14(g), 15(h), 19(h), 20(b), 25) Diagnosis Bothynus gisae resembles B. cyclops, but the new species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: Protarsomere 5 of male gradually widening towards apex (Figure 11 (g)); parameres with apical lobes visible in caudal view (Figure 13 (g)); apex of parameres rounded in lateral view (Figure 14 (g)); in female, tergite 8 nearly glabrous (Figure 19 (h)) with shallow and small punctures on discal region (Figure 20 (b)). Holotype Male, dissected, labelled: ‘ ARGENTINA, Misiones, Eldorado, 22.i.1995 ’ (CERPE). Paratypes 14 males and 11 females, labelled: “ ARGENTINA: Tucuman, Apeadero Militar Gen. Muñoz, 18 km sud Tafi del Valle, 1670 m, 15.xii.2006, P. Schmidt leg. – 1 male (FDPC). ‘ BRASIL: Distrito Federal, Brasília, x.1992, E. & P. Grossi legs’. – 1 female (CERPE); ‘ BRASIL: Distrito Federal, Planaltina, Embrapa Cerrados, área agrícola, 15°35'54'' S, 47°42'51'' W, 17.xii.2005, luz, C. Oliveira leg’. – 1 male (CEMT); ‘ BRASIL: Goiás, São João D’AlianÇa, Chapada dos Veadeiros, Faz. Sendai, 900 m, 14.xi.2007, R. M. Koike leg’. – 1 male (CERPE); ‘ BRASIL: Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimarães, Aldeia Velha, 15°26'28''S, 55°45'08'' W, 01.iii.2023, F.R. Tortato’ – 1 male (CEMT); ‘ BRASIL: Minas Gerais, Lavras, 12.iv.2008, L. G. Paranhos leg’. – 1 male (CERPE); “ BRASIL: Minas Gerais, Montes Claros, com. Lagoinha, 16°53'10''S, 43° 51'50''W, iii. 2023, 989 m, G. L. D. Leite – 3 females (CEMT). “ BRASIL: Minas Gerais, Buritis, Fazenda Querência, 03.xii.2012, luz, C. M. Oliveira leg. – 2 females (CEMT); ‘ Brasilien, Na Teutonia, Fritz Plaumann, xi-1972 ’ – 1 male and 1 female (BCRC); ‘ Jabaguara, São Paulo, 17.xii.1933, Halik’ – 1 female (BCRC); “ Porto Flor, (TC) S. Paulo, I.1922, Halik – 1 male (BCRC). ‘ Mafra, Santa Catarina, xii-1931, Brazil, A. Maller Collector’ – 2 males (USNM). ‘ PARAGUAY: CAAZAPÁ: Estero Cristal, 20.x.1999’ – 1 female (CERPE). ‘ Paraguai, Caazapa, Estero Cristal, 20.x.1999, A. P. Dreckzel Leg’. – 1 male (BCRC). ‘ Cerro, Amambay, Paraguay, Oct. 1939, A. Schultze, M. Robinson Collection, 1959’ – 2 males and 2 females (USNM). ‘ PARAGUAY: Cordillera, Cabañas, Caacupe, 19 February 1981, RD Cave colr’ – 1 male (RDCC). Holotype description (Figure 3 (g)) Length: 25.9 mm. Width: 14.1 mm. Colour: Predominantly reddish brown, except pronotal cavity and head darker. Head: Clypeus subtriangular, posterior width 3.8 times wider than anterior; lateral margins sinuous, strongly constricted towards anterior half; anterior teeth conical, separated by a narrow groove; surface strongly rugopunctate, glabrous. Frontoclypeal carina strongly marked, arched. Frontal surface transversely, strongly rugose, glabrous. Interocular width equals 2.8 transverse eye diameters. Ocular canthus bearing arched anterior margin. Mouthparts: Mandible with apical and medial teeth subequal in size, slightly back produced; basal tooth triangular, smaller than previous ones; apical tooth pointed apically, medial tooth rounded apically (possibly abrased). Labium subtriangular, flattened, densely setose laterally; disc rugopunctate, scarcely setose. Antennae: Club subequal in length to antennomeres 2–7 combined. Prothorax: Pronotum with strong, conical anterior tubercle, transverse at basis; cavity deep, rounded, broad (occupying 2/3 of anterior pronotal area); posterior area strongly convex in lateral view; cavity transversely rugose, limited by small punctures; pronotal sides close to margins bearing dense, deep, large punctures, from coalescent to contiguous, gradually becoming shallow, smaller, sparser (about 2–3 puncture diameters apart), towards to a posterior disc with minute punctures. Pterothorax: Scutellar plate subparabolic, smooth. Elytral striae well marked; surface covered by large, ocellate, deep punctures, contiguous on sutural stria, from contiguous to separated by 2 puncture diameters on other striae; punctures on interstriae scarce, irregularly arranged. Legs: Inner protarsal claw deeply incised, with subequal branches. Protarsomere 5 gradually widened towards apex, bearing a subapical, ventrolateral process (Figure 11 (g)). Mesotibial outer surface only with a middle carina. Metatibia with 2 carinae projected on outer surface (one basal, one medial). Abdomen: Tergite 7 with stridulatory apparatus formed by 1 band of numerous, transverse, finely marked striae. Tergite 8 glabrous, densely rugopunctate on sides; discal area with shallow, scarce punctures. Ventrite 4 completely setose; ventrites 5–7 with a row of setose punctures confined on sides, disc smooth; sternite 8 smooth. Aedeagus: Parameres, in caudal view, bearing subparallel sides at basal half, abruptly constricted lateroventrally towards apical half; apex bearing 2 long, oval lobes (Figure 13 (g)). Parameres, in lateral view, bearing a small, basal carina on ventral surface; apex rounded (Figure 14 (g)). Variation in the paratypes Males. Length: 25.0–26.0 mm. Width: 14.0– 14.1 mm. Mouthparts: Mandible bearing a tapered, pointed medial tooth, subequal to apical one. Maxilla provided with 6 teeth (2 at apex [1 strong, 1 weak], 1 medial [strong], and 3 basal [weak]) arranged on apex of galea. Prothorax: Pronotal tubercle truncated apically. Females (Figure 15 (h)). Length: 24.5– 25.5 mm. Width: 13.0– 14.5 mm. Prothorax: Anterior pronotal tubercle small; cavity shallow, declivous, strongly rugose; sides and posterior area nearly completely covered with large, dense, deep, from contiguous to coalescent punctures; middle area just behind cavity bearing minute punctures. Legs: Inner protarsal claw simple, similar to outer claw. Abdomen: Tergite 8 weakly setose, with scarce setae transversely arranged on an area close to posterior margin (Figure 19 (h)); discal region with shallow and transverse punctures (Figure 20 (b)). Sternite 8 strongly rugose, covered with moderate setae. Distribution Argentina (Missiones, Tucuman), Brazil (Distrito Federal, Goiás, Minas Gerais, Santa Catarina), and Paraguay (Caazapá) (Figure 25). Etymology The specific epithet ‘ gisae ’ is given after the wife of the first author. Remarks Bothynus gisae sp. n. refers to ‘ Bothynus species 1 ’ mentioned by Ratcliffe et al. (2023).

Published as part of Duarte, Paulo R. M., Dupuis, Fabien & Grossi, Paschoal C., 2025, Taxonomic revision of the Bothynus ascanius (Kirby, 1819) (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae) species group, pp. 663-737 in Journal of Natural History 59 (9 - 12) on pages 700-704, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2025.2456579, http://zenodo.org/record/14971553

Keywords

Coleoptera, Bothynus gisae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Scarabaeidae, Bothynus, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green