
This study investigates the challenges faced by non-native English speaking (NNES) agricultural scientists in publishing research articles and explores the effectiveness of genre-specific writing instruction informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). The research examines the linguistic features of successful agricultural research articles across three sub-genres (original research, review articles, and short communications) to identify genre-specific conventions. A mixed-methods approach, employing a quasi-experimental design, evaluates the impact of an SFL-informed writing intervention on the quality and effectiveness of research articles written by NNES agricultural scientists. Quantitative data, including pre- and post-instruction writing scores and improvements in specific writing skills, are analyzed alongside qualitative feedback from participants. The findings reveal distinct metafunctional preferences across sub-genres and demonstrate significant improvements in writing quality following the intervention. The study highlights the importance of genre-specific instruction tailored to the needs of NNES researchers in agricultural science and offers practical recommendations for developing effective writing pedagogy.
Genre analysis, Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Non-native English speakers (NNES), Agricultural science, Academic writing, Research articles, Publication, Meta-functions.
Genre analysis, Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Non-native English speakers (NNES), Agricultural science, Academic writing, Research articles, Publication, Meta-functions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
