Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of Nature-Based Solutions Implementation Practice

Authors: Kluvankova, Tatiana;

Assessment of Nature-Based Solutions Implementation Practice

Abstract

Governance of Nature-based Solutions embodies a holistic approach that acknowledges the intrinsic and relational values of nature, aiming to align human activities with ecological systems for sustainable development and long-term well-being. Despite broad applications, there are barriers to NBS’s widespread implementation that hinder its effectiveness and scalability. The objective of this deliverable is to assess current socio-political challenges in NBS design and implementation practice with a special focus on the vulnerability of humans and non-human species, and to create an institutional typology of nature-based governance. D.4.1. is explorative to provide hermeneutic understanding about the problematic situations in seven LL sites and articulate and form hypotheses or questions for future, broader scale scientific work on the societal, environmental, and institutional conditions of NBS design and implementation. It builds on the study from seven COEVOLVERs LLs’ learning communities in eight European countries (Czech Republic and Slovakia, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Finland, Estonia, and Scotland) with a completed survey with the general public and interviews with key stakeholders. The study underlined high connectivity to nature in all the LLs, which provided motivation for pro-nature action and highlighted the barriers and benefits in implementing NBS and deriving promising NBS potential for LLs communities, including vulnerable and other than human agencies. This forms the basis for conceptual work on nature-based governance that manifests the interconnection of physical and social domains, concerning vulnerable agencies to include LLs into the co-creation of nature-based governance models and allocating rights to other than human species. The benefit of such governance mode is to address sustainability challenges by working with nature to identify institutional solutions that can tweak the coevolution of institutions and the environment into more sustainable directions.D.4.1. as work in progress will further inform the institutional reconfiguration (D.4.2) and co-creation of nature-based governance models (D.4.3). Furthermore, forthcoming survey under the T.3.4. will complement analyses in measuring attitudes, beliefs and motivations on a broader scale, The survey will also meet the requirements of random sampling and representativeness, and hence it will provide further interpretative support for the D.4.1. survey results. 

Keywords

social politics of NBS, nature based governance, co-creation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average