
Policy Briefing 66 (v1) describes the clear benefits which agroforestry systems have for biodiversity and the protection of ecosystems. But how can these be demonstrated in carbon farming projects, without a monitoring complexity and timescale which makes the projects uneconomic? Biodiversity was the only one of the six “sustainability” areas recognised in the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy which co-legislators of the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification Framework insisted must show a clear co-benefit. For the other five areas (mitigation, adaptation, water resources, pollution and the circular economy) it is sufficient that projects should “do no significant harm”. Several potential indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health are suggested for inclusion in the Carbon Farming Delegated Act of the CRCF, due to be published in summer 2025 We also propose a structure for an Agroforestry Carbon Farming Management Plan which sets out the activities and potential monitoring steps to be undertaken in agroforestry carbon farming projects.
EURAF Policy Briefing #66
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
