Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLICATIONS, AND REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION OF ETONOGESTREL AND LEVONORGESTREL CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANTS

Authors: Dr Ikobho Ebenezer Howells1*, Onojoserio Oghenetega2, OZORI, Ebiogbo Stanley3, Okpara Abuchi Loveday4, Ogidigba Peter Ikorira5, Atemie Gordon6;

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLICATIONS, AND REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION OF ETONOGESTREL AND LEVONORGESTREL CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANTS

Abstract

Abstract Background Etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, though safe, but exhibits adverse effects severe enough to necessitate discontinuation. Objective This study intends to compare the complication rates, and reasons for discontinuation of etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, at Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital (NDUTH) Method and materials It was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 1232 women who used etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, and discontinued during the study period. A total of 324 women used etonogestrel implants, while 908 used levonorgestrel. Data collected was: Socio-demographic characteristics, the duration of contraceptive use, the complications experienced, and the reasons for implant removal. Results The mean age of the women who took etonogestrel implants was significantly higher than that for levonorgestrel, t = 3.99(0.85, 2.49), p = 0.0001. Regarding parity, significantly more women of very high parity (grand multiparous women) took etonogestrel p = 0.007. While more of nulliparous women took levonorgestrel implants p = 0.005. The mean duration of contraceptive use was significantly higher among women who used levonorgestrel implant, t = 2.23, p = 0.02, and more women replaced etonogestrel implant than levonorgestrel, odds ratio = 17.43[10.83, 28.05], p = 0.001. Compared to levonorgestrel implants, women who used etonogestrel significantly had more complications, p = 0.002, especially vaginal bleeding (p = 0.002), weight gain (p = 0.0001), and breast pain (p = 0.001). Expired implant (44.7%) was the commonest reason for removal, and the rate was significantly higher among women who used levonorgestrel, p = 0.001.There was no difference in the discontinuation (from complications) between the two groups, except heavy vaginal bleeding, which was twice higher among those who used etonogestrel, odds ratio = 2.59[1.85, 3.63], p = 0.001. Conclusion Etonogestrel implant has more complications than levonorgestrel, especially irregular vaginal bleeding, weight gain, and breast pain. Keywords: etonogestrel, levonorgestrel, implants, complications.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average