Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Addressing gender inequality: Fostering inclusive research

MINDtheGEPs special report | Insights from the Open Forum roundtable
Authors: Santinhos, Miguel;

Addressing gender inequality: Fostering inclusive research

Abstract

To take meaningful steps toward inclusive progress in research, it is imperative to challenge the traditional systems and norms that perpetuate inequality. What practical strategies can address the ongoing challenges of gender inequality in research? How can traditional evaluation methods be reformed to foster a more inclusive research environment? On November 27 2024, MINDtheGEPs and Elsevier co-hosted an Open Forum roundtable titled ”Equality in Focus: Steps Towards Inclusive Progress.” This event brought together diverse stakeholders, including academics, research leaders, and advocates for gender equality, to discuss systemic barriers and explore practical strategies for fostering inclusivity in research. The Open Forum featured insights from the Elsevier 2024 Gender Report, presented by Ylann Schemm, Vice President of Corporate Responsibility and Executive Director of The Elsevier Foundation. A distinguished panel of speakers shared their perspectives on how to address challenges and drive systemic change. This report synthesizes the key conclusions and recommendations from the discussion, followed by a summary of the panellists’ key contributions. Panellists: Silvia Penati, Professor of Theoretical Physics, University of Milano-Bicocca, and Chair of CoARA’s TIER group. Marina Calloni, Professor of Social and Political Philosophy, and Director of the research center Against Domestic Violence (ADV), University of Milano-Bicocca. Ylann Schemm, Vice President of Corporate Responsibility and Executive Director of The Elsevier Foundation. Angela Balzano, Researcher in Sociology of Law, University of Turin, and MINDtheGEPs Trainer. Moderator: Max Voegler, Vice President for Global Strategic Networks (DACH), Elsevier.

Keywords

Gender equality, Gender inequality, Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average