
This dataset comprises BALF cell images stained by Diff-quick staining and Gram staining, from patients who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage and endotracheal aspirates between 2018 and 2024 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The dataset contained 2105 images, with 13,263 annotated cells from seven typical cell classes, including erythrocyte, ciliated columnar epithelial, squamous epithelial, macrophage, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and eosinophil cells using both contour fine labeling and bounding box labeling. All cells that could be confidently identified by senior clinical cytologists were annotated. A small number of cells, for which consensus could not be reached among the cytologists, were left unannotated due to uncertainty. In addition, the classical YoloV8 deep learning instance segmentation model was used to detect and segment the seven types of BALF cells. We uploaded the best YOLO model weights as a supplement. As observed, our model demonstrated exceptionally high accuracy. There are four types of the dataset: High Resolution Images, Images, Visualization Images, and Labels, which are helpful to promote the study of automated cell identification in BALF. High Resolution Images: a total of 1903 original images (4,912×3,684 pixels) from clinical samples collected by an ImageView optical microscope (202 images were missed because of the initial anonymous input, but were all included in Images). Images: 2105 images from High Resolution Images resampled to the size of 853×640 for bounding box annotation and pixel-level high quality annotation, then applied directedly for network training. Visualization Images: images that showed manually labeled contours on each cell. Labels: saved in a txt format for direct use of YOLO series models and a convenient way to convert to other data formats.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
