Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

GWAS summary statistics for 9 quantitative phenotypes from the UK Biobank (5-fold cross-validation)

Authors: Zabad, Shadi;

GWAS summary statistics for 9 quantitative phenotypes from the UK Biobank (5-fold cross-validation)

Abstract

This dataset contains GWAS summary statistics for 9 quantitative phenotypes from the UK Biobank. The phenotypes are: HEIGHT: Standing height (Data-Field: 50) BMI: Body mass index (Data-Field: 21001) WC: Waist circumference (Data-Field: 48) HC: Hip circumference (Data-Field: 49) BW: Birth weight (Data-Field: 20022) FVC: Forced vital capacity (Data-Field: 3062) FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1-second (Data-Field: 3063) HDL: HDL cholesterol (Data-Field: 30760) LDL: LDL cholesterol (Data-Field: 30780) The GWAS study used data from "White British" samples (N = 337225), which were randomly divided into 5 folds for the purposes of cross-validation. The upload contains, for each fold, GWAS summary statistics for the training, validation, and test set. The validation summary statistics can be used for model selection/tuning. The test summary statistics can be used to evaluate PRS models via pseudo-validation methods. Association testing was done with plink2. The structure of the data is as follows: train fold_1 chr_1.PHENO1.glm.linear chr_2.PHENO1.glm.linear ... fold_2 fold_3 ... validation fold_1 fold_2 fold_3 ... test fold_1 fold_2 fold_3 ... For more details about the GWAS study, Quality Control (QC) criteria, or other information, please consult our publication: Zabad, S., Gravel, S., & Li, Y. (2023). Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 110(5), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.03.009 If you use this data in your work, please cite the publication above.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average