
Material characterization in nano-mechanical tests requires precise interatomic potentials for the computation of atomic energies and forces with near-quantum accuracy. For such purposes, we develop a robust neural-network interatomic potential (NNIP), and we provide a test for the example of molecular dynamics (MD) nanoindentation, and the case of body-centered cubic crystalline molybdenum (Mo). We employ a similarity measurement protocol, using standard local environment descriptors, to select ab initio configurations for the training dataset that capture the behavior of the indented sample. We find that it is critical to include generalized stacking fault (GSF) configurations, featuring a dumbbell interstitial on the surface, to capture dislocation cores, and also high-temperature configurations with frozen atom layers for the indenter tip contact. We develop a NNIP with distinct dislocation nucleation mechanisms, realistic generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE) curves, and an informative energy landscape for the atoms on the sample surface during nanoindentation. We compare our NNIP results with nanoindentation simulations, performed with three existing potentials -- an embedded atom method (EAM) potential, a gaussian approximation potential (GAP), and a tabulated GAP (tabGAP) potential -- that predict different dislocation nucleation mechanisms, and display the absence of essential information on the shear stress at the sample surface in the elastic region. We believe that these features render specialized NNIPs essential for simulations of nanoindentation and nano-mechanics with near-quantum accuracy.
Condensed Matter - Materials Science, Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci), FOS: Physical sciences
Condensed Matter - Materials Science, Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci), FOS: Physical sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
