Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ World Journal of Adv...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Building Damage Assessment in Aftermath of Disaster Events by Leveraging Geoai (Geospatial Artificial Intelligence): Review

Authors: Taiwo H. Agbaje; Nemi Abomaye-Nimenibo; Chinedu James Ezeh; Abdullahi Bello; Ayoola Olorunnishola;

Building Damage Assessment in Aftermath of Disaster Events by Leveraging Geoai (Geospatial Artificial Intelligence): Review

Abstract

While traditional approaches to building damage assessment in the aftermath of natural disasters have relied heavily on time-intensive and costly manual techniques, recent advances in geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) have opened up new possibilities for automating and scaling up this crucial process. Leveraging technologies such as computer vision, remote sensing, and machine learning applied to geospatial data from satellites, drones, and other sensors, GeoAI has the potential to revolutionize how communities assess building damage in disaster-stricken areas and target recovery resources more quickly and effectively. However, efforts to apply GeoAI for building damage assessment also face important challenges regarding data and model quality that require further research. To properly evaluate both the opportunities and challenges of leveraging GeoAI for building damage assessment, this comprehensive review explores the current state of the field through an analysis of recent literature and case studies. An in-depth examination is provided of innovative applications of technologies such as deep learning to high-resolution aerial imagery for automated detection and classification of structural damage. Critical requirements are identified for developing robust GeoAI solutions, such as acquiring comprehensive training data that captures the full range of possible damage patterns and accounting for environmental factors. The review also analyzes efforts by humanitarian organizations and companies to deploy initial GeoAI-powered damage assessment systems in real-world disaster events, highlighting lessons learned.

Keywords

FOS: Computer and information sciences, Convolutional Neural Networks, Big Data Challenges, Semantic Interoperability, Vgi, Building Damage Assessment, Remote Sensing, Unmanned Aerial Systems, Model Training, Field Observations, Geospatial Artificial Intelligence, Disaster Events, Geoai, olunteered Geographic Information, Distributed Computing, Crowd-Ai Partnerships, Disaster Management

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
gold