
Danger and harm can be intentionally programmed into any published content. The reason is social: the word is always action and invites action, but when it is written and deliberately speculates with the reader's consciousness, it is about neuro-linguistic negative effect on practical behavior and hence complicity in crimes influenced by reading. According to the author, markers for a "Dangerous Book" are: propaganda of ideology, immorality, illegality and obscene associations. But warns that in the sense of "the book as a product and an object" there are no Dangerous Books; Dangerous Books can be spoken of only in the sense of "the book as a media" and these are the texts spreading ethnic and religious enmity and hatred; the texts-accomplices in acts of ethnic cleansing, in crimes against the person and her rights. Note: Downloaded document is in Bulgarian.
Library Collection Development/ethics, Ethics, Book, Reading, Library sciences, Anticipation of danger, Books, Pedagogy, Writing, Dander/physiology
Library Collection Development/ethics, Ethics, Book, Reading, Library sciences, Anticipation of danger, Books, Pedagogy, Writing, Dander/physiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
