
Background: The hospital environment plays a critical role in patient recovery, influencing both physical and psychological well-being. This study examines how environmental factors, including physical design, noise levels, natural light, and social interactions, impact patient outcomes in a tertiary hospital setting. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, incorporating quantitative assessments length of stay, pain levels, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction) and qualitative interviews with patients and healthcare providers. Statistical analysis was performed to compare recovery outcomes between standard and enhanced hospital environments, while thematic analysis identified key psychological and sociological influences on patient well-being. Results: Patients in enhanced hospital environments had shorter hospital stays 6.1 vs. 7.8 days, p < 0.01), lower pain scores 3.8 vs. 5.4, p < 0.01), reduced anxiety and depression p < 0.01), better sleep quality p < 0.01), and higher satisfaction scores p < 0.01). Qualitative findings revealed that natural light, reduced noise, positive healthcare interactions, family presence, and patient control over their space contributed to a more positive recovery experience. Conclusion: Hospital environments significantly impact patient recovery. Incorporating patient-centered design elements, improving staff-patient communication, and optimizing hospital settings for comfort and well-being can enhance both clinical and psychological outcomes. These findings support the need for evidence-based hospital design and policy changes to improve patient recovery and satisfaction.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
