
This poster uses European Research Data Landscape (ERDL) data to compare responses of researchers affiliated with Research Performing Organizations in the UK with those in EU member states. The ERDL online, self-administered survey asked about production, use, and deposit of research data. There were also specific questions on awareness and practice of FAIR principles. The survey was open from November 2021 to February 2022. The survey finds commonalities in intention to share data for positive reasons, but reusing others data does involve work. That the biggest obstacle to sharing and acceding data is data protection. They also share the perception that their institutions are a primary support source in helping produce FAIR data. And that institutions should produce easy to understand policies and support, while funders should promote positive incentives to sharing and FAIRness rather than negative sanctions. The biggest difference between the EU and UK is found in FAIR awareness and practice. UK respondents are more aware of FAIR principles, and far more likely to write data management plans as well as have an ORCID. The UK is also more likely to acknowledge the role of funders in policy, training, support and infrastructure provision.
IDCC25, Research Data Management, European Research Data Landscape, UK, FAIRdata, EU, Education and training: How effective is current training in delivering knowledge and skills?
IDCC25, Research Data Management, European Research Data Landscape, UK, FAIRdata, EU, Education and training: How effective is current training in delivering knowledge and skills?
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
