
Fuzzy voting methods were used and qualitative information was processed in three different decision-making and negotiation processes. The voting was sometime proceeded digitally with mock-up software. After a short theoretical introduction to decision-making, negotiation techniques and fuzzy voting, the practical regional and municipal projects and use of fuzzy voting are presented. Some comparisons are then made and opportunities and risks are formulated based on the results.
+ ID der Publikation: hslu_106220 + Art des Beitrages: Wissenschaftliche Medien + Sprache: Deutsch + Letzte Aktualisierung: 2025-01-29 11:23:18
fuzzy voting, eParticipation, negotiating principles, decision making
fuzzy voting, eParticipation, negotiating principles, decision making
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
