Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Modelling Textbook English using a Modified Multi-Feature/Dimensional Analysis (MDA) Framework

Authors: Le Foll, Elen;

Modelling Textbook English using a Modified Multi-Feature/Dimensional Analysis (MDA) Framework

Abstract

Abstract English as it is represented in secondary school English as Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks is often perceived as somehow different from ‘real-life’, ‘authentic’ English. Indeed, previous studies have shown that individual lexico-grammatical features are often misrepresented (see Le Foll 2024 for a synthesis of the literature). This is problematic given that textbooks are an important and highly influential vector of foreign language input in secondary education. It is therefore worth asking: Does Textbook English constitute a special variety of English? And, if so, in what ways does it differ from ‘real-life’, extra-curricular English? This talk focuses on the modified version of the multi-feature/multi-dimensional analysis (see Biber 1988; Berber Sardinha & Veirano Pinto 2014; 2019: 19) framework used to answer these questions in Le Foll (2024). MDA is used to compare the language of nine series of EFL textbooks used at in lower secondary education in Germany, France and Spain with three target language reference corpora. Inspired by Diwersy et al. (2014) (2014) and Neumann & Evert (2021), this modified MDA framework is based on principal component analysis (PCA) and extensive multi-dimensional visualisations. The framework further incorporates additional steps designed to increase both the reproducibility and replicability of the results. Following a theoretical introduction to both the research questions at hand and the MDA framework, the open-source tools used to conduct MDAs in this study are presented from a practical point of view. Together, we examine the functionalities of the Multi-Feature Tagger of English (MFTE Le Foll 2021; see also Le Foll & Shakir 2023) and a number of useful R libraries. To this end, we draw on the RMarkdown scripts that are part of the Online Supplements of Le Foll (2024; https://elenlefoll.github.io/TextbookMDA). Finally, we discuss the steps taken to improve the reproducibility and replicability of the results, in line with the principles of Open Science. References Berber Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.). 2014. Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Berber Sardinha, Tony, Marcia Veirano Pinto, Cristina Mayer, Maria Carolina Zuppardi & Carlos Henrique Kauffmann. 2019. Adding Registers to a Previous Multi-Dimensional Analysis. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, 165–188. New York, NY: Bloomsbury. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024. Diwersy, Sascha, Stephanie Evert & Stella Neumann. 2014. A weakly supervised multivariate approach to the study of language variation. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech, 174–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. Le Foll, Elen. 2021. Introducing the Multi-Feature Tagger of English (MFTE). Perl. Osnabrück University. https://github.com/elenlefoll/MultiFeatureTaggerEnglish. (5 January, 2022). Le Foll, Elen. 2024. Textbook English: A Multi-Dimensional Approach (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Le Foll, Elen & Muhammad Shakir. 2023. Introducing a New Open-Source Corpus-Linguistic Tool: The Multi-Feature Tagger of English (MFTE). Presented at the ICAME44, NWU Vanderbijlpark (South Africa). Neumann, Stella & Stephanie Evert. 2021. A register variation perspective on varieties of English. In Elena Seoane & Douglas Biber (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103), 144–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Related Organizations
Keywords

English education, corpus linguistics, English Language Teaching, English as a Foreign Language

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green