Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROCESSING FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. A SUBJECT FIELD REVIEW

Authors: Burak L.;

TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR PROCESSING FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. A SUBJECT FIELD REVIEW

Abstract

The main objective of the technological process of processing food raw materials is to extend the shelf life, maximize the preservation of organoleptic indicators, nutritional value, ensure microbiological stability and safety of the finished product. The purpose of the work is to review modern traditional and innovative methods of processing fruits and vegetables, their advantages and limitations, as well as the impact on the quality and nutritional value of finished processed products. The material for this review is scientific articles in English and Russian published in the period 2015-2025. The search for scientific literature on this topic was carried out by keywords in the bibliographic databases Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. When performing the work, scientific methods were used: search and screening of scientific literature, data extraction, analysis, systematization and generalization. When selecting publications for the review, priority was given to highly cited sources. To review the subject field of the study, an algorithm was used in accordance with the PRIZMA protocol. Traditional plant processing methods such as blanching, pasteurization, sterilization and drying are widely used in the food industry to inhibit microbial growth and inactivate enzymes, ensuring the safety of the finished product and increasing shelf life. However, these methods require the use of high temperatures, which can adversely affect the nutritional value and organoleptic properties of heat-sensitive products. Research shows that reducing the processing temperature can minimize these negative effects. Innovative non-thermal technologies such as high-pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric fields (PEF), ohmic heating, cold plasma and ultraviolet processing allow for more efficient preservation of nutrients and improvement of such product properties as color, consistency and taste, as well as reduce processing time, which makes them particularly suitable for industrial applications. However, each of these methods has its limitations and requires further study to optimize processing conditions. The combined use of traditional and new methods can help ensure microbiological stability, maximum preservation of nutritional value, organoleptic indicators of the finished product. This will not only extend the shelf life of products but also satisfy the growing needs of consumers for high-quality products with high nutritional value.

Keywords

vegetables, fruits, blanching, pasteurization, drying, ohmic heating, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed electric field, cold plasma, nutritional value.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green