Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Checklists to help implement improvements in training for reviewers and evaluators

appsOther research productkeyboard_double_arrow_right Other ORP type 24 Jan 2025Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: University of Bristol Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research; DORA San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment; Morebrains; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14729234 , 10.5281/zenodo.14729233

Checklists to help implement improvements in training for reviewers and evaluators

Abstract

These checklists are intended to help as you plan how to improve diversity, inclusion, and equality in pre-award fundingprocesses through improvements in training for reviewers and evaluators. The first checklist is a high-level list of general actions and questions to consider within your organisation before you start planning any specific interventions. The second checklist provides a more focused set of questions that can be used to inform your plan to improve your training for reviewers and evaluators. The checklists were finalised in October 2024 and published here in January 2025.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average