Authors: University of Bristol Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research; DORA San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment; Morebrains; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14729152 , 10.5281/zenodo.14729151

Changes to application processes to reduce likelihood of bias in outcomes: An NIHR case study.

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) responded to a call by DORA for examples of work currently being carried out by funding organisations on changes to their application processes designed to reduce likelihood of bias in outcomes. This high-level case study focuses on some of NIHR’s work in this area as part of their Research Inclusion Strategy. The case study was finalised in October 2024 and published here in January 2025.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average