
Multi-criteria risk evaluation dataset The following geo-files represent the evaluated indicators aggregated over three dimensions of ecosystem services: provisioning, regulating, and cultural. The georeference used is ETRS89 / UTM zone 33N (EPSG: 25832). The values indicate the relative closeness from the ideal situation according to the TOPSIS multi-criteria evaluation method. Within the "TOPSIS.xlsx" file, the evaluation criteria (thresholds and weights) for each indicator are defined with local stakeholders. These geofiles are part of doctoral dissertation on the drought and heat risk assessment for urban green infrastructure and their ecosystem services in the town of Plauen, Germany. Data sources and overview Shehayeb, R. (2025). Testing the Drought and Heat Risk (DHR) Assessment Framework for Urban Green Infrastructure: Overview and Data Sources. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15526315
Risk, Climate, Multi-criteria Evaluation, TOPSIS, Ecosystem Services
Risk, Climate, Multi-criteria Evaluation, TOPSIS, Ecosystem Services
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
