
The socio-emotional climate of schools plays a pivotal role in shaping students' academic, social, and emotional development. This study examines and compares the socio-emotional climate of government and private schools to identify the differences in the quality of social and emotional interactions within these institutions. A sample of 300 students, comprising 200 from government schools and 100 from private schools, was selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected through a standardized socio-emotional climate scale developed by Dr. Renuka Kumari and Smt. Rajni Bhargava in 1994., and statistical techniques, including t-tests, were employed for analysis. The findings reveal significant differences in the socio-emotional climate of government and private schools. Private schools demonstrated a more positive socio-emotional climate, with higher mean scores in both social and socio-emotional dimensions, while emotional climate showed no significant difference between the two types of institutions. The results suggest that private schools excel in creating an environment that fosters better social interactions and integrated socio-emotional development, likely due to superior resources, smaller class sizes, and greater parental involvement. Conversely, government schools face challenges in these areas, which may impact students’ overall development. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing the socio-emotional climate in government schools through targeted interventions such as teacher training, social-emotional learning programs, and improved infrastructure. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for policymakers and educators to focus on bridging the gap between government and private schools to ensure holistic development and equity in educational opportunities.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
