Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Wild elephants vary in their attraction to novelty across an anthropogenic landscape gradient

Authors: Jacobson, Sarah L.; Dittakul, Sangpa; Pla-ard, Mananya; Sittichok, Supang; Yindee, Marnoch; Plotnik, Joshua;

Wild elephants vary in their attraction to novelty across an anthropogenic landscape gradient

Abstract

Research on how wild animals respond to novelty is becoming more relevant as the overlap between natural habitats and human-dominated landscapes increases. Wild Asian elephants spend more time in anthropogenic landscapes as their habitat is converted to agriculture. Greater neophilia and exploration may allow elephants to successfully access agricultural resources, which may cause negative interactions with people. We compared wild elephant reactions to novel objects in two different landscapes in Thailand (near agriculture and deep inside a protected sanctuary). We also assessed consistency in measures for individuals exposed to different objects to determine whether their reactions could be considered personality traits. Elephants tested near agriculture were more neophilic and exploratory than those inside the sanctuary. However, the limited sample of elephants exposed to both novel objects did not demonstrate consistency in their reactions, and thus, we could not determine whether neophilia or exploration were personality traits in this population. Neophilic and exploratory elephants likely benefit from high-quality agricultural resources, but at a potential cost to both elephants and humans. Knowledge about the elephants' behavior and attraction to particular landscapes could aid in human-elephant conflict mitigation efforts that consider the needs of both species and aim for more stable coexistence.

Funding provided by: United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceROR ID: https://ror.org/04k7dar27Award Number: F18AP00456 Funding provided by: Elephant FamilyCrossref Funder Registry ID: Award Number: THA-175 Funding provided by: U.S. National Science FoundationROR ID: https://ror.org/021nxhr62Award Number: DGE-1646736 Funding provided by: Golden Triangle Asian Elephant FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: Award Number: Funding provided by: Research Foundation of The City University of New YorkROR ID: https://ror.org/01d03cj21Award Number: Funding provided by: United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceROR ID: https://ror.org/04k7dar27Award Number: F19AP00052 Funding provided by: United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceROR ID: https://ror.org/04k7dar27Award Number: F22AP00035

Behavioral data were coded using Behavioral Observation Research Interactive Software from camera trap videos, and measures were extracted from the codes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

coexistence, human-elephant conflict, exploration, neophilia, Asian elephant, Personality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average