
This article defines the rapid evolution of educational discourse in the context of in Uzbek and English Languages. Traditional face-to-face teaching methods are scrutinized, revealing their limitations in addressing the diverse needs of today's multilingual and multicultural student populations. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding the linguistic and cultural features of oral educational discourse to overcome communication barriers. Through a comparative analysis of Uzbek and English educational discourses, the article identifies four main communication styles—closed, aggressive, manipulative, and open—and examines their manifestations in different cultural contexts. The research highlights the critical role of teachers as communicators and the impact of social and cultural norms on educational interactions. The findings underscore the necessity of adapting educational practices to accommodate diverse cultural backgrounds, enhancing the effectiveness of teaching and learning in a globalized educational sphere.
educational discourse, oral communication, multilingual education, multicultural education, didactic communication, social communication, communication styles, Uzbek discourse, English discourse, cultural barriers, Educational discourse, oral communication, multilingual education, multicultural education, didactic communication, social communication, communication styles, Uzbek discourse, English discourse, cultural barriers
educational discourse, oral communication, multilingual education, multicultural education, didactic communication, social communication, communication styles, Uzbek discourse, English discourse, cultural barriers, Educational discourse, oral communication, multilingual education, multicultural education, didactic communication, social communication, communication styles, Uzbek discourse, English discourse, cultural barriers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
