
In this work we compare a number of classification algorithms in predicting COVID19 deaths. We combine data from a number of different datasets in the Vivli database and we demonstrate that while classic algorithms perform well in terms of accuracy, if one wands to increase the specificity it needs to treat the imbalance in the number of observations between the two classes. In almost all the cases improving specificity has a small cost in the overall accuracy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
