
These guidelines offer clear instructions for citing contributions from our growing community of observers who document biodiversity through the MINKA Citizen Observatory platform. From citing specific citizen science projects to using photographs, accessing data via our API, or retrieving observations through global repositories, this guide ensures both scientific rigor and appropriate recognition of community contributions. Developed by the EMBIMOS research group at Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) and drawing inspiration from GBIF's citation guidelines, this document provide a framework that acknowledge both academic requirements and the vital role of citizen scientists in advancing biodiversity knowledge. The document is avalaible in English, Spanish and Catalan.
Citizen science; data governance; data provenance; data ethics, Citizen Science, Data Science/ethics, Data Science/standards, Citizen Science/ethics
Citizen science; data governance; data provenance; data ethics, Citizen Science, Data Science/ethics, Data Science/standards, Citizen Science/ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
