Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cues to Action and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Female Staff in Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State

Authors: KADRI Adenike Koseganlola Risikat (RN, PhD); Prof. OHAERI Beatrice M. (FWACN); OLAOYE, Elizabeth Bolanle (RN, BNSc); OLALEYE, Christiana Oluwatoyi (RN, MSc); AYANLEKE, Ismail Adebare (RN, MSc); JIMOH, Esther Ozichu (RN, MSc); BELLO, Salihu Sule (RN, BNSc);

Cues to Action and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Female Staff in Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a global public health problem as it is the fourth most common cancer among women globally. This study aimed to examine the cues to action, attitudes among female staff at Lead City University (LCU), Ibadan. Using a quantitative descriptive cross-sectional design, the study surveyed 184 female staff aged 18 and above, employing a multi-stage sampling technique to ensure diverse representation. A validated, structured questionnaire was used for data collection, with reliability coefficient of 0.8 Analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing descriptive and inferential statistics. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained before data collection. The results revealed significant findings on cues to action, with 98.3% of respondents strongly agreeing that a family history of cervical cancer would prompt screening uptake. However, social media and information sources were less influential, with only 27.2% agreeing to their impact. Attitudes towards CCS showed a mix of barriers and enablers. While 64% of respondents demonstrated a positive attitude. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address barriers such as cost, accessibility, and awareness. Promoting family and cultural involvement, coupled with robust health communication strategies, could significantly improve CCS uptake among women at LCU. Keywords: Attitude, Cervical Cancer Screening, Cues to Action, Female Staff,

Keywords

Cervical Cancer Screening, Attitude, Cues to Action, Female Staff

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research