
Academic integrity is a cornerstone of modern education, ensuring the quality of learning and shaping the ethical standards of future professionals. This is particularly crucial in medical education, where adherence to academic integrity directly impacts the safety and quality of future healthcare practices. This literature review examines contemporary approaches to promoting academic integrity in medical universities and explores factors that contribute to its violation among medical students. The findings highlight the multifactorial nature of academic dishonesty, driven by individual, institutional, social, cultural, and technological factors. Key challenges include the misuse of artificial intelligence tools, high academic stress, and a lack of awareness regarding the ethical and professional implications of academic misconduct. The study underscores the importance of implementing comprehensive strategies, such as promoting a culture of integrity, improving plagiarism detection systems, and enhancing ethics education, to mitigate academic dishonesty and foster a strong foundation for ethical medical practice.
academic integrity, medical education, academic dishonesty, plagiarism, ethics, artificial intelligence, academic stress, ethical standards, medical students, professional development.
academic integrity, medical education, academic dishonesty, plagiarism, ethics, artificial intelligence, academic stress, ethical standards, medical students, professional development.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
