Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Collection . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Collection . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

COVID "vaccine" immune imprinting library

Authors: Sass, Erik;

COVID "vaccine" immune imprinting library

Abstract

Compiled by Dr. Steven Hatfill, MD, MMed, Erik Sass, et al. Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14632346 Last updated January 11, 2025. Corresponding author: eriksass@gmail.com Immune imprinting, dubbed “original antigenic sin” by Thomas Francis Jr., occurs when memory B lymphocytes produced in response to an initial viral infection dominate subsequent responses to related viruses, producing antibodies geared to the original exposure. Long-term immune memory has many advantages, but immune imprinting can be harmful if it interferes with immune response to later infections. The following collection of over 100 peer-reviewed papers (n=131) suggests that COVID “vaccines” imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to the “wild type” spike protein from the original Wuhan strain, shaping their response to subsequent variants in potentially harmful ways. Immune imprinting impaired responses to new variants by skewing B cell production of antibodies toward the “ancestral” spike protein at the expense of new antibodies specifically tailored to the variants’ heavily mutated spike. Additionally, by imprinting a single antigen – the spike protein – on recipients’ immune systems, the “vaccines” prevented them from forming antibodies to other, less mutation-prone parts of the virus, such as proteins from the virus nucleocapsid (Ahmed MIM et al., Delgado JF et al., Paula NM et al., Smith CP et al., Yao D et al). Further findings point to “deep immunological imprinting” or “hybrid immune damping,” in which “vaccination” combined with infection alters later immune response unpredictably (Aguilar-Bretones M et al., Gao B et al., Hornsby H et al., Ju B et al., Reynolds CJ et al., Wang Q et al.). This collection originated with Dr. Steven Hatfill’s contribution to TOXIC SHOT: Facing the Dangers of the COVID “Vaccines” (Chapter 5: Debunking CDC’s Bad Science). See also: “SARS-CoV2 spike protein pathogenicity research collection” (n=320) https://zenodo.org/records/14559644 “mRNA ‘vaccine’ biodistribution, persistence, and adjuvant toxicity library” (n=130) https://zenodo.org/records/14559625 “SARS-CoV2 vaccine and viral variant research library” (n=63) https://zenodo.org/records/14594436

Keywords

mRNA Vaccines/genetics, mRNA Vaccines/immunology, mRNA Vaccines/pharmacology, SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity, antigenic imprinting, vaccine adverse events, mRNA Vaccines, immune imprinting, original antigenic sin, SARS-CoV-2/immunology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities