Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/20...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

HOW EARTH SCIENCE DATA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BECAME SUSTAINABLE

Authors: Virapongse, Arika; Gallagher, James; Tikoff, Basil;

HOW EARTH SCIENCE DATA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BECAME SUSTAINABLE

Abstract

We interviewed people in leadership positions from 11 infrastructure projects that weredetermined to have achieved long-term sustainability. The goal was to characterize theapproaches that lead to sustainability for each of these projects, and document if andwhen these organizations had difficulty. The work was originally an outgrowth of theEarthCube Project Council of Funded Projects. Protocol development, interviews, anddiscussion was conducted by a group of eight people with expertise on different aspects ofdata infrastructure. Almost all the studied projects started as federal funded research projects. Most projects(only one had not) had successfully made the transition from a project to an organization.This transition was a challenge for many projects, as it often involved changes inleadership and organizational funding model. The studied projects divided naturally intothree distinct types – Database, Framework, and Middleware – and some generalities forsuccess were noted for the different project types. The Framework and Database projectwere strongly supported by a disciplinary community, which provided the intellectualcommitment. Successful Databsase projects were critical for the workflow for one or moredisciplinary communities. Framework projects generally maintained active participation ofa community by utilizing bottom-up governance approaches. Middleware projectsapproached sustainability models in ways similar to software companies; success alsorequired maintaining strong scientific partnerships. The implications from our study include the following. First, science cyberinfrastructureneeds resources to develop and sustain itself; the mechanisms/guidelines/funding sourcesfor these supporting these activities are not worked out. At present, many resources areprovided through in-kind support from academics, researchers, and their institutes.Second, effort is necessary to find appropriate models that help sustain infrastructure forearth science over the long-term. Third, organizations – rather than projects – appear toprovide the best platform for long-term stability for earth science infrastructure. Umbrellaorganizations may be necessary for development of new Database projects forcommunities that are underserved in their digital needs.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average