Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diagnostic Accuracy of RPR and TPHA Tests for Syphilis in Pregnant Women: A Study on Biological False Positives and Screening Efficacy

Authors: Shazia Umar; Archana Kumari Sharma; Rajkumar Gurjar; Rambabu Sharma;

Diagnostic Accuracy of RPR and TPHA Tests for Syphilis in Pregnant Women: A Study on Biological False Positives and Screening Efficacy

Abstract

Background: Syphilis, caused by Treponema pallidum, remains a significant public health issue, particularly for pregnant women, with the potential to cause severe maternal and fetal complications, including stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, and congenital syphilis. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent these adverse outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) tests in identifying syphilis in pregnant women and to evaluate the prevalence of biological false-positive results. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted from November 2023 to November 2024, involving 6,363 non-duplicate venous blood samples collected from antenatal care patients at PIMS Hospital. All samples were initially tested with the RPR test, and reactive cases were further tested using the TPHA. Data were analyzed using MedCalci software, with statistical significance set at a p-value of 1:16. A total of 39 biological false-positive cases (0.61%) were identified in dilutions below 1:8. Among the 109 RPR reactive cases, the majority (73.39%) were in the 21-30 years age group, with 25.69% of false positives also occurring in this group. However, this age distribution was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Syphilis diagnosis in pregnancy requires a combination of RPR and TPHA tests to minimize false-positive results. Regular screening and early treatment are crucial to prevent syphilis-related complications. The study underscores the need for confirmatory testing in clinical practice to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, ultimately reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with syphilis.

Background: Syphilis, caused by Treponema pallidum, remains a significant public health issue, particularly for pregnant women, with the potential to cause severe maternal and fetal complications, including stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, and congenital syphilis. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent these adverse outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) tests in identifying syphilis in pregnant women and to evaluate the prevalence of biological false-positive results. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted from November 2023 to November 2024, involving 6,363 non-duplicate venous blood samples collected from antenatal care patients at PIMS Hospital. All samples were initially tested with the RPR test, and reactive cases were further tested using the TPHA. Data were analyzed using MedCalci software, with statistical significance set at a p-value of 1:16. A total of 39 biological false-positive cases (0.61%) were identified in dilutions below 1:8. Among the 109 RPR reactive cases, the majority (73.39%) were in the 21-30 years age group, with 25.69% of false positives also occurring in this group. However, this age distribution was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Syphilis diagnosis in pregnancy requires a combination of RPR and TPHA tests to minimize false-positive results. Regular screening and early treatment are crucial to prevent syphilis-related complications. The study underscores the need for confirmatory testing in clinical practice to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, ultimately reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with syphilis.

Keywords

Syphilis, RPR, TPHA, biological false positives, antenatal screening, pregnancy, Treponema pallidum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green